Why Investors Must Not Ignore RBI’s Warnings on Crypto

Despite repeated RBI warnings on crypto, India remains without a clear framework, leaving millions exposed to fraud and speculation.

The story of Anil Singh Chauhan, a retired banker from Kanpur, is a cautionary tale for millions of Indians tempted by the glitter of cryptocurrency. Within just over a month, Chauhan lost Rs 2.52 crore — his life savings, loans taken on heavy interest, and even family jewellery — to an elaborate scam masquerading as a crypto trading platform. What began as a stranger’s friendly text escalated into late-night chats, video calls, and promises of quick returns. In the end, Chauhan was left financially ruined, with little legal recourse.

His ordeal is not unique. It is the predictable outcome of India’s current position on cryptocurrency: neither fully legal nor fully banned, but tolerated in a regulatory vacuum. Despite years of RBI warnings on crypto, investors continue to fall prey to fraud, volatility, and unchecked speculation.

The Speculative Casino of Crypto

Crypto has been marketed as the “future of money” and a revolutionary financial innovation. In reality, it resembles a speculative casino where ordinary savers often stand no chance. Price swings in tokens such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Solana can wipe out an entire investment in hours, making the volatility of equity markets look tame in comparison.

For everyday investors, the promise of decentralization and freedom from traditional finance masks a brutal truth: the lack of safeguards makes them highly vulnerable. Unlike equities overseen by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), crypto exchanges in India face little accountability. There is no equivalent of investor protection funds, no insurance, and no recourse if an exchange collapses or a wallet is hacked.

RBI’s Relentless Warnings

The Reserve Bank of India has consistently raised alarms about cryptocurrencies. For years, it has flagged their potential use in money laundering, terror financing, and tax evasion. RBI officials, including Governor Sanjay Malhotra, have gone so far as to say that crypto is “not money, not an asset, not anything that deserves legitimacy.”

The central bank’s concerns are not theoretical. Allowing crypto into the mainstream financial system risks undermining the very foundation of monetary stability. If private digital tokens gain widespread acceptance, they could weaken the effectiveness of monetary policy, fragment payment systems, and destabilize the rupee.

This is why RBI warnings on crypto have remained sharp, direct, and unambiguous. Yet, despite these repeated cautions, millions of Indians continue to invest. More than two crore citizens are estimated to hold some form of cryptocurrency.

The Government’s Half-Measure

Instead of a clear regulatory framework, the Indian government has chosen half-measures. In 2022, it imposed a 30 percent tax on crypto gains and a 1 percent TDS on transactions. While these measures reduced speculative volumes and created some deterrence, they also gave crypto a veneer of legitimacy in the eyes of the public.

What we currently see is a paradox:

  • The government taxes crypto transactions but offers no protection for investors.

  • Exchanges must register and comply with anti-money laundering checks, but enforcement remains weak.

  • Victims of fraud, like Chauhan, have little recourse beyond police complaints that rarely succeed.

Compared to equities, where SEBI enforces strict compliance, crypto remains a wild frontier. In effect, the state collects taxes while leaving investors exposed to predatory risks.

Lessons from Global Regulators

Globally, the regulatory landscape is evolving rapidly. The European Union has already introduced a comprehensive framework requiring crypto entities to maintain reserves, disclose information, and comply with anti-money laundering norms. Even in the United States, where regulatory clarity is fractured, authorities have pursued lawsuits, levied fines, and taken enforcement actions against exchanges and intermediaries.

Meanwhile, China has opted for an outright ban on cryptocurrencies, while simultaneously developing its own central bank digital currency (CBDC). Japan and Australia have adopted cautious but structured frameworks, ensuring disclosure and compliance without actively encouraging speculative growth.

Against this backdrop, India sits in a twilight zone: not banning crypto, not regulating it comprehensively, and not offering investor protection. This middle-ground approach has left citizens dangerously exposed while also stalling legitimate innovation.

The Rise of Stablecoins

Adding another layer of complexity is the rise of stablecoins, digital tokens pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar. The U.S. recently passed the GENIUS Act, giving stablecoins a formal regulatory framework and promoting them as instruments of payment.

Stablecoins reduce volatility but carry their own risks:

  • Market shocks or liquidity crunches can destabilize them.

  • Widespread adoption of dollar-backed stablecoins could weaken India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI).

  • Dependence on foreign-backed tokens may undermine domestic monetary policy.

The possibility of payment fragmentation only strengthens RBI warnings on crypto, highlighting the risks of allowing unregulated digital assets into mainstream finance.

Why India Must Act Now

India’s hesitation comes at a cost. Every day of delay allows scams, frauds, and speculative bubbles to grow. For a country still building basic financial literacy, the stakes are high. Unlike developed economies with safety nets, Indian households rely heavily on personal savings. A wiped-out investment can mean lost education funds, foreclosed homes, or shattered retirements.

The government must make a choice: either ban crypto outright or regulate it under the harshest possible conditions. Regulation should not just focus on taxation but enforce strict licensing of exchanges, mandatory KYC, investor protection funds, and transparent disclosures.

The Path Forward for Investors

For individual investors, the lesson is clear: until a robust framework emerges, crypto remains a high-risk gamble. Caution must outweigh curiosity. Investors should avoid unverified platforms, question promises of overnight wealth, and recognize that scams thrive in unregulated spaces.

Traditional investment vehicles — equities, mutual funds, bonds, and gold — may not carry the same thrill but provide security and regulation. In India’s context, crypto is better seen as speculation, not investment.

Conclusion

India stands at a crossroads. The RBI warnings on crypto have been loud, consistent, and well-founded, yet investor enthusiasm continues unchecked. Without decisive government action, more savers will fall into scams, eroding trust in the financial system.

Crypto may play a role in global finance, but for India today, it is little more than organized gambling wrapped in blockchain. Policymakers face a simple choice: regulate hard or risk another wave of ruined households.