Ragapay Exposed: Why This Unregulated UK Entity Poses Severe Risks to Merchants

1. Executive Summary

Ragapay presents itself as a global payment gateway provider capable of serving high-risk industries such as forex, crypto, and gaming. However, an in-depth analysis reveals serious transparency gaps in its operational structure, licensing status, and compliance posture.

No financial licence, no PCI-DSS certification, no disclosed acquirer partnerships, and missing corporate identity information — these elements collectively position Ragapay as a potentially unregulated payment operator, posing severe financial and reputational risks for merchants.

2. Public Presentation vs. Regulatory Visibility

Ragapay’s website markets end-to-end payment solutions, quick merchant onboarding, and multi-currency acceptance. Yet, it fails to mention:

• Any regulatory licence under the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
• Any PCI-DSS certification or third-party audit statement.
• Any registered address, acquirer relationship, or banking disclosure.

For a company offering financial intermediation, such omissions are highly unusual. Legitimate payment service providers are required to display licensing details and compliance seals to reassure merchants of data security and lawful fund handling.

3. Corporate Identity Gaps

Public records on Companies House UK list Ragapay Ltd (Company No. 13811949) as an incorporated entity, yet the website Ragapay.com does not reference this legal name or registration number anywhere.

This separation between the trading name and the registered company name makes it impossible to confirm who legally operates the Ragapay brand. Moreover:

• The website lists no registered office address or contact number.
• The “About” section provides only marketing text, with no verifiable corporate details.
• There is no published Merchant Agreement, Terms & Conditions, or Data Protection Policy outlining responsibilities and liabilities.

In compliance terms, such lack of transparency signals non-adherence to the UK Companies Act (2006), which mandates all incorporated entities to display their full corporate credentials on digital and commercial communications.

4. Staffing and Digital Footprint

An inspection of LinkedIn reveals a small cluster of profiles associated with Ragapay. However, the findings raise questions:

• Most accounts lack profile photos or feature generic images.
• Employment histories are minimal, often showing Ragapay as their first and only role.
• The listed “CEO” or key managers do not have prior industry records or public fintech credentials.
• No verified executive from Ragapay Ltd appears on LinkedIn or company pages.

This pattern aligns with other unverified payment setups that use synthetic or placeholder profiles to create a perception of legitimacy while concealing true operational ownership.

5. Compliance and PCI-DSS Concerns

No section on Ragapay’s website or public communication mentions compliance with:

• PCI-DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard)
• FCA, EMI, or PI registration
• GDPR data-handling guidelines

Without these, the company cannot lawfully process or store payment data within regulated frameworks.
This omission creates a major risk for merchants, as cardholder and transaction data may not be handled securely or within legally protected environments.

6. Risk Indicators for Merchants

Indicator	Observation	Risk Level
Legal entity mentioned on website	❌ Absent	High
FCA or EU Licence	❌ None found	High
PCI-DSS Certification	❌ Not listed	High
Contact transparency (address, phone)	❌ Missing	High
Team verification	⚠️ Unverifiable profiles	Medium
Settlement terms & contracts	❌ Not available online	High
Onboarding claims (within 5 days)	⚠️ Unrealistic timeline	Medium

These patterns collectively indicate a high probability of unregulated operations — which can expose merchants to:

• Frozen settlements and withheld funds.
• Lack of dispute or refund support.
• Data compromise through insecure transmission or storage.
• Reputational damage if associated with non-compliant processors.

7. How Merchants Can Verify Before Onboarding

Before working with any payment gateway, TheFinRate recommends merchants take the following steps:

1. Request Licensing Proof — Verify the company’s name on FCA, EU, or central bank registers.
2. Ask for PCI-DSS Attestation — Genuine processors must furnish a current compliance certificate.
3. Check Acquiring Bank Partnerships — Ensure the gateway discloses at least one verified acquiring partner.
4. Search for Independent Reviews — Use neutral sources (e.g., TheFinRate.com, Trustpilot, or corporate filings).
5. Request Contract Samples — Verify the existence of settlement timelines and refund clauses.

These checks are essential for avoiding losses due to unlicensed aggregators or intermediary networks that lack regulatory cover.

8. TheFinRate Advisory

Ragapay’s lack of licensing information, compliance disclosures, and identifiable management team represents a high-risk profile within the fintech ecosystem.
Until the company provides verifiable proof of:

• PCI-DSS certification,
• a regulated financial partner,
• and its operational registration under UK or EU law,

merchants should avoid transmitting funds, customer KYC data, or settlement information via this platform.

As with any payment processor lacking transparent ownership and compliance visibility, the risk of delayed payouts or complete fund loss remains significant.

9. Summary

Ragapay operates without publicly verifiable licensing, PCI-DSS credentials, or identifiable leadership, making it a potentially unregulated payment gateway that could expose merchants to high financial and operational risks.

fintech risk alerthigh-risk payment gatewaymerchant safetyPayment Gateway ReviewRagapayRagapay LtdUK Payment ProcessorUnlicensed PSP