Federal Court Blocks Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Open Banking Rule

A preliminary injunction issued by the U.S. federal courts has temporarily halted enforcement of the open banking rule promulgated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The decision marks a significant procedural win for bank and financial industry groups who had challenged the regulation’s validity.

Regulatory Ambitions Put on Hold

The CFPB’s open banking framework was designed to broaden competition and innovation by allowing consumers to grant third-party apps secure access to their banking information. It sought to replace legacy practices such as “screen-scraping” with standardized data-sharing protocols.
However, U.S. District Judge Danny Reeves of the Eastern District of Kentucky ruled that the CFPB may not enforce the rule until it completes a formal reconsideration process.
The ruling effectively pauses one of the agency’s most anticipated initiatives, introducing uncertainty around implementation timelines and regulatory obligations.

Banks Welcome the Pause

Industry groups that brought the lawsuit—including the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), the Kentucky Bankers Association and Forcht Bank—hailed the ruling as a necessary breather from what they viewed as a hastily implemented rule.
Their key concerns:

• The CFPB’s rule imposed broad data-sharing mandates that banks argued went beyond consumer rights as described in Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
• The regulation prohibited banks from charging fees to data aggregators, a move banks said shifted burdens without legal justification.
• Lack of clarity around liability, data protection and the scope of “authorized third parties.” The industry saw these as operational and cybersecurity risks.

Fintech Sector Pushes Back

Fintech groups expressed disappointment. The Financial Technology Association (FTA), which intervened as a defendant supporting the rule, warned that the delay could stall consumer-centric innovation.
Millions of Americans rely on open-banking integrations to access budgeting tools, credit platforms, and digital financial services. Without standardized APIs and regulated access, fintechs argue they will continue relying on less secure “screen-scraping” methods.

A Shifting Regulatory Landscape

The CFPB’s open banking rule has become one of the most contested items on its fintech agenda. In May 2025, the agency itself acknowledged that the rule exceeded its authority and moved to vacate it.
As part of its ongoing review, the CFPB reopened the rulemaking process and issued a new comment period. According to filings, the agency received nearly 14,000 submissions from stakeholders.
Meanwhile, regardless of the eventual rule outcome, banks and fintechs face uncertainty over how and when the regulated environment for data sharing will take shape.

Broader Implications for Fintech Innovation

The suspension underscores a core tension in U.S. open-banking efforts: balancing innovation with consumer protection, data security and regulatory authority.
In the U.K. and EU, open-banking frameworks under PSD2 and related regulations are well-established. The U.S., by contrast, is grappling with jurisdictional complexity, bank infrastructure readiness and competing policy priorities.
With the enforcement of the CFPB rule paused, fintech firms may delay investment in open-banking infrastructure, new integrations and APIs—potentially slowing the pace of innovation and stalling partnerships. For consumers, the practical outcome may be a continued reliance on less efficient data-sharing methods and fewer choices.

What Comes Next

The next steps for the CFPB will heavily influence U.S. financial-data policy. Observers expect the agency to revisit key definitions around consumer consent, “authorized third parties,” liability, data security and fees.
Because a new rule must be drafted and finalized, and given the injunction remains in place, many analysts believe the pause could stretch well into 2026. Until then, the U.S. financial system’s move toward more transparent and interoperable data flows remains uncertain.

Key Highlights:

• Injunction Issued: Federal court stops enforcement of CFPB open-banking rule.
• Court & Judge: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Judge Danny Reeves.
• Rule: Based on Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act, aimed at consumer-directed financial-data sharing.
• Impacted Parties: Banks (relief from immediate compliance), fintechs (delay in regulated access), consumers (pause in data-sharing choice).
• Timeline Unclear: Reconsideration by the CFPB underway; new rule may take until 2026 or beyond.

#DataSharingBankingInnovationCFPBConsumerFinanceDigitalBankingFinancialServicesFintechNewsOpenBankingRegTechTheFinRate